Home Distance Learning Are NUJS on-line courses illegal? IPleaders, ex-SJA prez Arjun Agarwal argue out each facet of the case

Are NUJS on-line courses illegal? IPleaders, ex-SJA prez Arjun Agarwal argue out each facet of the case

by Lisa A. Yeager

By July of the last 12 months, NUJS Kolkata’s intervening time administration had unilaterally shut down its distance, getting to know certificates courses contractually provided with the aid of all third parties.

This resulted in one scholar coming near the Calcutta High Court, which chastised NUJS for its selection due to confusion about the reputation of already-enrolled college students. optimum

Distance training company leaders, installation with the aid of NUJS Kolkata graduates Abhyudaya Agarwal and Ramanuj Mukherjee, which changed into walking 11 guides for NUJS, became the hardest hit via the ban.

Leaders have reached out to us in the past with an in-depth announcement arguing that its online courses were never illegal and that the onus became on the person alleging illegality to offer such proof.

2016-18 NUJS Student Juridical Association (SJA) president Arjun Agarwal, who has, when you consider graduated from NUJS, has long claimed the other, which was later regularly occurring through NUJS’ instructional and government councils. He wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in March.

We have allowed each aspect’s responses and counter-responses to the respective arguments (Arjun Agarwal responding utterly privately). The feature published the alternate under (due caution, the full documents of their arguments, blanketed under this article, are pretty lengthy).

Disclosures: The leaders were advertisers on Legally India for several years. The agoders’ arguments are summarised.

In precis, the leaders’ case is that its online publications with NUJS were no longer illegal on the grounds of non-recognition. No prison provisions have been presented that such courses are unlawful. UGC had especially regulated all sorts of online courses via new policies in 2018, with the aid of new admissions to the guides, which had already been discontinued, it argued.

Leaders have furnished the subsequent precis of its role:

UGC started regulating online courses via rules issued in 2018 (applicable from 4th July). By then, admissions in all online guides conducted with the help of leaders had stopped. These guidelines are prospectively relevant and cannot consequently affect the finishing touch of courses of ongoing students or the despatch of certificates to students who had already completed the classes with their aid.

No students had been admitted as soon as the guidelines were in force.

Until 2018, rules were not issued, and non-recognition via UGC hints most effectively implied that the ranges granted without such recognition weren’t valid for Central Government recruitment functions. It does not mean illegality or a prohibition from launching and undertaking guides through online mode. This changed into the case with all the other online guides being presented through India, which includes the aid of various institutions of eminence, as UGC gave no recognition for any online publications without a governing regulation.

NUJS, being a statutory college, became empowered by Section 5 of the WBNUJS Act, 1999, a regulation handed over by the West Bengal Government, to run its personal certificates and diploma courses without requiring any additional approvals from IGNOU / UGC unless there was a clear provision to the contrary in every other instrument.
NUJS also implemented the reputation of its online publications below the IGNOU Distance Education Council’s (DEC) Guidelines in 2014-2015, which were applicable then. However, no movement has been made to NUJS’ utility by using UGC. UGC has admitted that it did not recognize any new institutions as distance schooling companies between 2013 and 2017.

The outright prohibition by way of unique UGC via its 2016 letters that Arjun Agarwal cites changed into now not relevant to NUJS because it was relevant simplest to universities diagnosed by using UGC for offering distance guides which carried out online guides (the letter became addressed explicitly to those universities), or to universities which had been not recognized using UGC however misled involved applicants to consider that they’re so known by using UGC. NUJS’ online guides are now not recognized via UGC, and NUJS no longer misleads candidates about the non-reputation of its online publications, and alternatively, especially knowledgeable applicants via website and admission paperwork that there has been no UGC reputation and the results thereof.

This function is agreed upon by UGC and all universities, including IIMs and IITs, and some of the important universities that have provided online courses in large numbers in the remaining ten years. UGC never permitted any of these establishments or publications. However, they were correctly run, and UGC has not objected to the identical. UGC did not have any criminal device under which it could regulate or limit any online course in the first place until July 20,18, when the scan h instrument change legislated. In the absence of any clear provision of a regulation that prevented NUJS from offering online guides without UGC reputation, unwell-informed men and women, inclusive of Arjun Agarwal, are looking to point at disparate instruments seeking to claim that UGC prohibited NUJS from offering online courses without UGC recognition, that is simply unjustifiable.

So far, NUJS EC has not allowed either students of the web courses or leaders to provide their aspect of the case, which has been systematically prevented. Leaders are interested in an independent inquiry that must be set up before college students of the guides affected, and leaders must be heard.

Related Posts